4 ms·
People love to hear good news about their bad habits. I guess all those studies that took years of work and got published in peer review scientific journals lik
by vfc1 7y ago
People love to hear good news about their bad habits. I guess all those studies that took years of work and got published in peer review scientific journals like Nature, all the latest reports from the UN.
All of that goes out of the window because some guy decided to "do some number crunching". Well, what qualifies him to speak on these matters, where are his results?
Where they published in a peer-reviewed journal, does he have any idea what he is talking about? Did he take into account the consequences of the deforestation needed to produce meat, animal methane emissions?
What this guy is saying is in complete contradiction to mainstream scientific magazines and the UN.
Why should we listen to this guy just because he is telling us us what we want to hear?
- eej2ya1K 7y agoLooking at the comments here, I'm pretty sure he's telling you the exact opposite of what you want to hear.
- vfc1 7y agoBased on what, that's the question. It's the internet, you got scientists who spent years studying this issue, performed hundreds of studies to reach conclusions, published their conclusions in peer-reviewed journals. And then some guy from Twitter comes along and says "No it's not" and people run with it just because that's what they want to hear.