I must say that the ogg video samples i have seen are not as good as the h.264 samples. But good enough for probably 90% of internet video. Anyway, i think Web

I must say that the ogg video samples i have seen are not as good as the h.264 samples. But good enough for probably 90% of internet video. Anyway, i think WebM comes very close already (i actually don't see differences): http://www.quavlive.com/video_codec_comparison http://www.quavlive.com/video_codec_comparison Instead of embracing the patent encumbered codec we should be thankful for Google to actually buy a codec (VP8) and release it _for free_. I couldn't imagine this from any other company. Still many people just want their h.264 no matter what. It's bad for a free and open internet, that's my belief.