4 ms·
ISPs have proven themselves untrustworthy repeatedly, CloudFlare yet really hasn't. Not that I like the control they have, but it's honestly the fault of ISP's
by Avamander 7y ago
ISPs have proven themselves untrustworthy repeatedly, CloudFlare yet really hasn't. Not that I like the control they have, but it's honestly the fault of ISP's this has happened.
- userbinator 7y agosome ISPs. The problem is that Mozilla is taking a very US-centric view of a product that is used worldwide.
- gsnedders 7y ago…and DNS over HTTPS, using CloudFlare, is only being enabled in the US. A US-centric view for a US-only decision seems fair to me?
- magashna 7y agoThe change is only being rolled out to the US.
- Avamander 7y agoTrue, I don't think it's ideal, but non-US entities are in slumber, there's still basically no deployment of more secure standards by ISPs. I'd send my ISP an e-mail about providing DoH but they can't even give me IPv6.
- falcolas 7y agoCloudflare has taken sites offline before, in response to legal requests (CP) and social pressure (8ch). Whether it’s right to do it or not, Cloudflare has proven that it is not a neutral party.
- comex 7y agoCloudFlare has stopped hosting particular websites; they haven't censored DNS requests. There's a huge difference between the two.