> It doesn't necessarily mean (in Apple's marketing terminology) actual, legitimate professional industry I made the point elsewhere, but I think that ignores

> It doesn't necessarily mean (in Apple's marketing terminology) actual, legitimate professional industry I made the point elsewhere, but I think that ignores "professionals in the workplace doing this alongside other things". These can easily be "pro" for content creation teams, like editorial staff for capturing Stories from events and the like. Just because they're not replacements for high-end commercial photography equipment doesn't mean they're not being used as intended by professionals. Completely agree that their terminology might be skewing, but I wouldn't be so dismissive of their use in a professional context, even if the users aren't "photography professionals" themselves.