>Could be handwritten notes, for example. Good, but how would they be relevant? A handwritten note is only a "personal" record of sorts, possibly capturing th

>Could be handwritten notes, for example. Good, but how would they be relevant? A handwritten note is only a "personal" record of sorts, possibly capturing the opinion of the writer at the moment it is written, not something "objective" or actually proving anything. And it can be recreated at will. I mean, let's say that you actually have an a4 sheet of paper where you wrote by hand (at the time) either of: "Today's meeting has been almost completely unuseful, the managers don't want to consider the safety issues involved with the MCAS operation" or: "Today's meeting has been almost completely succesful, I finally managed to tell the managers how there are no foreseeable safety issues with the MCAS operation." Now, if you had the second piece of paper what would prevent you to destroy it and re-create the first one? Or simply destroy it? If it is a hand-written note, it must be a hand written note by someone else, and still if it was - even - tangentially implicating the "current custodian" in the matter it would probably have been destroyed the day after the second accident or in the very early stages of the investigation, particularly since - being a handwritten note - there is no possible way to prove that it ever existed at all. On the other hand, if those documents are in any way "official" they should have a track record on "Boeing side". Clearly something is escaping us (well me at least).