2 ms·

Here's what the spec [1] says about the sequence diagram aspect of the language: "[Ballerina's] abstractions and syntax for concurrency and network interaction

Here's what the spec [1] says about the sequence diagram aspect of the language: "[Ballerina's] abstractions and syntax for concurrency and network interaction have been designed so that there is a close correspondence with sequence diagrams. This enables a bidirectional mapping for any Ballerina function between its textual representation in the syntax described in this specification and its graphical representation as a sequence diagram, such that the sequence diagram fully shows the aspects of the behavior of that function that relate to concurrency and network interaction." The two biggest things that are different about Ballerina in my view are the language abstractions for providing and consuming network services, and the correspondence with sequence diagrams. [1] https://ballerina.io/spec/lang/2019R3/ https://ballerina.io/spec/lang/2019R3/

vinodkd 7y ago
Can you share a sample of code, its equivalent sequence diagram, and how one is converted to the other please? I see that the samples have caller->method() style code, but how is this a sequence diagram? And where's the actual bidi mapping? To be clear: I'm not critical; its good that ballerina attempts to bridge the visualization and the implementation. I'd like to see an actual sample, though. Edit: Never mind, found the other poster who discovered your IDE plugin that shows the sequence diagram equivalent. Not sure how this is part of the language, though.