4 ms·
> You kind of buried this but this is the true deal breaker. Well i mentionned it. I'm at least partially intellectually honest :) > Firefox doesn't support W
by Raphael_Amiard 16y ago
> You kind of buried this but this is the true deal breaker.
Well i mentionned it. I'm at least partially intellectually honest :)
> Firefox doesn't support WebM yet. You'll have to wait on version 4 (0% market share right now as you said for IE9)
That's totally true, but from experience and statistical evidence, i think firefox users are more inclined to upgrade their browser than IE user are.
> There aren't (and probably won't be) hardware WebM decoders.
I don't think that's true
- dev_jim 16y ago> That's totally true, but from experience and statistical evidence, i think firefox users are more inclined to upgrade their browser than IE user are Very true. Our site has had for a while only a couple percent of non 3.5+ Firefox traffic.
- sigzero 16y agoThere are hardware decoders but nobody uses them at this point. It will be a very long very painful process. I am not sure whether it is good or bad.