3 ms·
For there to be corruption in this case there would need to be one state organization paying off (directly or indirectly) people in another state organization s
by vonmoltke 7y ago
For there to be corruption in this case there would need to be one state organization paying off (directly or indirectly) people in another state organization so the first organization can get what it wants. Is that what you are suggesting is happening here?
- mindslight 7y agoMy definition of corruption does not require someone being paid off, rather just the decision making process of an authority being well, corrupted, by common interests / worldview / cross pollination. In this case, the courts are treating claims by large institutions as prima facie valid rather than giving each party equal standing and making the claimant substantiate the basis for the debt.