>You're defining "bad things" to suit you. I Excuse me? 64GB standard storage for a "PRO" labeled $1000 phone that extensively advertises its professional vide

>You're defining "bad things" to suit you. I Excuse me? 64GB standard storage for a "PRO" labeled $1000 phone that extensively advertises its professional video capacity is not an arbitrary or personal definition of bad. It's objectively inferior to its competition. It's objectively the lowest storage space of any $1000+ phone on the market. That you would conflate this discussion to think these are arbitrary opinions seems dishonest. >"Boo changes you don't like, okay, fine. Boo the status quo? That's... odd." It seems like you accept predatory profit-driven business decisions as "status quo" even when competitors offer far better options. I don't get your definition of "status quo" when it's synonymous "worst in class". The Galaxy Note 10 at $1000 comes standard with 256GB, an upgrade which makes the iPhone cost $1150. But sure, "status quo", as long as the current state of the market and state of competition isn't considered...