> ...unsafe operation in one section of code (say, an imported library) can have negative impacts on unrelated sections of code otherwise deemed safe. Yeah. Ju

> ...unsafe operation in one section of code (say, an imported library) can have negative impacts on unrelated sections of code otherwise deemed safe. Yeah. Just like every line in C/C++ code can have negative impacts on unrelated sections. While true, that talking point feels somewhat unfair or even in bad faith. Rust requires "unsafe" escape hatch to be able be a low level systems language. Or gasp, to call libraries using C ABI. I write a lot of low level code in C/C++ (firmware, kernel drivers, low level services) and I think a C ABI compatible "runtimeless" safe language, like Rust, dramatically improve security, safety and even ultimately provide faster time-to-market.