3 ms·
I don't think the argument is novel, it's just a cut down counting/frequency argument. So any objections to those would presumably port over.
by Strilanc 7y ago
I don't think the argument is novel, it's just a cut down counting/frequency argument. So any objections to those would presumably port over.
- lisper 7y agoI dunno, I think you might be selling it short. This argument seems to be based on the mathematical continuity of probabilities, which is not something I can recall ever seeing before.