5 ms·
People who smoke cigarettes and otherwise have an unhealthy lifestyle overburden the health system and take away government spending that can be spent elsewhere
by throw554 7y ago
People who smoke cigarettes and otherwise have an unhealthy lifestyle overburden the health system and take away government spending that can be spent elsewhere. Why should I pay more because you drinks coke, diabetic and smoke yourself towards lung cancer?
- mpfundstein 7y agoAnecdotal counter evidence: All of my grand parents and their siblings smoked and drank alcohol and not one of them died of young age or a smoking releated disease. But I get your point. I pay a heavy tax on cigs though. I just hope the government puts that into a fund for cigarette relate health care issues instead of financing some wars in the middle east. Ah no, they don’t. They just exploit the addiction.
- blang 7y agoI believe a bulk of that tax on the federal level goes to funding health insurance for children: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cigarette_taxes_in_the_United_States#Under_the_Obama_Administration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cigarette_taxes_in_the_United_... State level taxes of course depend on the state.
- mieseratte 7y ago> Why should I pay more because you drinks coke, diabetic and smoke yourself towards lung cancer? Why should I pay taxes for schools and roads and services I don't use?
- jimhefferon 7y agoWe all pay taxes for schools so there will be engineers to build the airplanes, cars, dishwashers, etc., that we do use. Likewise, we pay for roads so that trucks carrying our dinners can get to the store.
- mieseratte 7y agoGuess I should've added a </rhetorical>
- jimhefferon 7y agoI have heard statement very close to that made by people who were entirely serious. Glad to hear you were not.
- kaibee 7y ago> People who smoke cigarettes and otherwise have an unhealthy lifestyle overburden the health system and take away government spending that can be spent elsewhere. Why should I pay more because you drinks coke, diabetic and smoke yourself towards lung cancer? Do you have a source? I know it sounds intuitively correct, but I remember reading the opposite. Basically it goes like this: end of life/senior care is a very large percentage of medical spending. Unhealthy people don't live as long and die faster once their health deteriorates. So they actually cost less to the healthcare system than healthy people. Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5316444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5316444/
- collyw 7y agoSmokers pay a fair bit in tax as well.
- atlasunshrugged 7y agoDepends on what jurisdiction you're talking about and what you consider a fair bit. Many countries aren't in compliance with the FCTC rules on 70% specific tax for tobacco
- atlasunshrugged 7y agoI don't have a good source for you on the counterargument you posited but I've been researching tobacco taxation for the last 3 months and I can tell you almost all literature I've read that's referenced that says that the burden of disease from smoking is more expensive.
- wolco 7y agoBecause you would need to change the rate for those who don't exercise, drive or ride in cars, drink coffee, play impact sports, eat junk food, have unprotected sex, is in the army, plays video games,, lives on the coast, works in a mine, etc