^ I'm not going to refute an argument you haven't made. Your hypothesis is that "what we have sucks" (true), your conclusion "therefore literally anything I jus

^ I'm not going to refute an argument you haven't made. Your hypothesis is that "what we have sucks" (true), your conclusion "therefore literally anything I just pulled out of thin air is better." Your conclusion is not supported by facts presented. If you would be so kind as to justify your assertion it would be a lot more interesting to think through it and you might convince me. But as-is, what you've put forth is lazy and poorly thought out.