4 ms·

I think you have an incorrect idea of "logic reasoning" if you think that that's a scientifically sound argument. To know whether this contaminated water will

I think you have an incorrect idea of "logic reasoning" if you think that that's a scientifically sound argument. To know whether this contaminated water will be insufficiently diluted in the ocean to cause problems, you definitely do need to use numbers. I mean, if it's diluted to a trillionth of the natural background radiation, then who cares?

pvaldes 7y ago
The question there then (I think that both will agree with that) is not if is a bad or good idea, is if (or how) they can get away with murder. The answer to this question is yes, of course. Had been doing it since 2011. The idea that they are getting short of space is ridiculous. The area around the central is not exactly crowded at this moment. To me is obvious that they are getting sort of money, not space, and trying disperately to find excuses to save at any cost, and pass the problem to other.
- Nodraak 7y ago
  Murder? Do you have a source for that? To my knowledge nobody died of radiation at Fukushima.
  - pvaldes 7y ago
    > nobody died of radiation at Fukushima. Are you sure? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-45423575 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-45423575 https://dictionary.cambridge.org/es/diccionario/ingles/get-away-with-murder https://dictionary.cambridge.org/es/diccionario/ingles/get-a...
    - Nodraak 7y ago
      Sorry for misunderstanding getting away with murder, I'm not a native english speaker. Thank you for the denifition. Not sure he died because of Fukushima: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2018/09/06/no-the-cancer-death-was-probably-not-from-fukushima/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2018/09/06/no-the-ca.... Anyway, we are discussing one case. Nobody died during the crisis and after 8 years there is only this case, and this is the second worst nuclear disaster. I am not saying that nuclear is the best, but it is way safer than how people think it is. And definitly way safer than other ways of producing electricity.

pvaldes 7y ago

The question there then (I think that both will agree with that) is not if is a bad or good idea, is if (or how) they can get away with murder. The answer to this question is yes, of course. Had been doing it since 2011. The idea that they are getting short of space is ridiculous. The area around the central is not exactly crowded at this moment. To me is obvious that they are getting sort of money, not space, and trying disperately to find excuses to save at any cost, and pass the problem to other.

Nodraak 7y ago
Murder? Do you have a source for that? To my knowledge nobody died of radiation at Fukushima.
- pvaldes 7y ago
  > nobody died of radiation at Fukushima. Are you sure? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-45423575 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-45423575 https://dictionary.cambridge.org/es/diccionario/ingles/get-away-with-murder https://dictionary.cambridge.org/es/diccionario/ingles/get-a...
  - Nodraak 7y ago
    Sorry for misunderstanding getting away with murder, I'm not a native english speaker. Thank you for the denifition. Not sure he died because of Fukushima: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2018/09/06/no-the-cancer-death-was-probably-not-from-fukushima/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2018/09/06/no-the-ca.... Anyway, we are discussing one case. Nobody died during the crisis and after 8 years there is only this case, and this is the second worst nuclear disaster. I am not saying that nuclear is the best, but it is way safer than how people think it is. And definitly way safer than other ways of producing electricity.