3 ms·
My understanding has always been that <- is the way that S did it, so that's the way R originally did it but = is almost always equivalent. I haven't found a p
by phuff 16y ago
My understanding has always been that <- is the way that S did it, so that's the way R originally did it but = is almost always equivalent. I haven't found a place in my modest R hacking yet that = hasn't worked the way I expected it to...
- hessenwolf 16y agoAnd I haven't found anything in my ten years of using R in statistical analysis where '=' didn't work either. I've written a lot of R code. A hedge process on €2bn is being monitored with '=' signs as we speak. Dastardly.