> It says that most people are rich because their parents are rich. Not because they inherited their wealth. Fair enough. It's an astute observation, but it's

> It says that most people are rich because their parents are rich. Not because they inherited their wealth. Fair enough. It's an astute observation, but it's misleading to say the first sentence, yet not imply the second, since most people aren't going to read into it that deeply. You'd just say: "Most people who are wealthy are so due to their stable home life, good schools, good network, good attitude and a financial backstop in the event of disaster". Why would you lead with parent wealth? It pre-supposes inheritance without additional context.