I was just highlighting the fact that the author led the campaign for the candidate who lost just last year to the candidate proposing the PFD hike. That's cert

I was just highlighting the fact that the author led the campaign for the candidate who lost just last year to the candidate proposing the PFD hike. That's certainly reason to suspect an unfair bias towards the implication that the PFD system is broken. I'm not saying it's not, but I would not hang my hat on this piece alone without more information and possibly giving more than a year to see how everything actually shakes out. If I were the author, I would have inserted a disclosure statement at the beginning. It all sounds logical, I'm simply stating that the author is far from an impartial reporter.