Economic issue should have been raised in protest and could have converted to mass movement to reject a house of car park size or make it illegal for developer

Economic issue should have been raised in protest and could have converted to mass movement to reject a house of car park size or make it illegal for developer to build such home. Force government through peaceful protest to take measures like Singapore for house, health and education. Universal suffrage is not a panacea, indeed in many democracies money decides who become the head of state. In two largest democracy USA and India its not possible to win elections without the support of billionaire or being a billionaire. Funny part in Hong Kong Uber is illegal and Taxi license is traded at astronomical prices and govt can't do anything due to powerful taxi union lobby (consisting mostly of taxi owners), they also involve in HK CEO election. In universal suffrage it will still be similar large number of bodies with vested interests. So a structural change won't happen unless it's really part of the protest. Recently read one another view on democracy quite interesting, although do not agree with it. [1] [1] https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/08/shawn-rosenberg-democracy-228045 https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/08/shawn-ros...