> was all the vaping done thus far and into the future worth even one person dying needlessly? If it's saved significantly more than that, there's a decent arg

> was all the vaping done thus far and into the future worth even one person dying needlessly? If it's saved significantly more than that, there's a decent argument that "yes it might have been". But that's specifically for nicotine e-cigs, in my opinion. They have a clear harm reduction purpose; slightly less clear when talking about THC carts, I think? Thought I'm likely incorrect about my assumptions on that.