3 ms·
Do you know where to find the actual meta analysis that article is talking about? They mention the journal, but not the title. I'm not really sure what their cr
by microcolonel 7y ago
Do you know where to find the actual meta analysis that article is talking about? They mention the journal, but not the title. I'm not really sure what their criteria were.
To me, it would seem that in order to compare the two, you would basically need to resample the 24/192 recording, with dither, and then resample it back to 24/192; and you would need to choose a high quality resampling filter. Anything other than that I wouldn't really consider a comparison.
Furthermore, given that the measured sensitivity is more likely on the frequency front than on the dynamic range front, did they establish a distinction between 44.1kHz and 48kHz?
- ddeck 7y agoThe study is here: (pdf) https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/13493/Reiss%20A%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20High%20Resolution%202016%20Published.pdf https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/134...
- microcolonel 7y agoThank you! It really is interesting, it seems like there's an opening for a better-designed experiment. Wonder if there's anyone at the local universities interested in that sort of thing.