4 ms·
Two things missed by the electrek piece: - The article is CC-BY and downloable without scribd horrible UI: http://jes.ecsdl.org/content/166/13/A3031 http://
by guerby 7y ago
Two things missed by the electrek piece:
- The article is CC-BY and downloable without scribd horrible UI:
http://jes.ecsdl.org/content/166/13/A3031 http://jes.ecsdl.org/content/166/13/A3031
PDF direct http://jes.ecsdl.org/content/166/13/A3031.full.pdf http://jes.ecsdl.org/content/166/13/A3031.full.pdf
HTML direct http://jes.ecsdl.org/content/166/13/A3031.full.html http://jes.ecsdl.org/content/166/13/A3031.full.html
- In the conclusion the authors mention:
Full details of these cells including electrode compositions, electrode loadings, electrolyte compositions, additives used, etc. have been provided in contrast to literature reports using commercial cells. This has been done so that others can re-create these cells and use them as benchmarks for their own R+D efforts be they in the spaces of Li-ion cells or “beyond Li-ion cells”.
So it's science as it should be!
- nwallin 7y ago> Full details of these cells including electrode compositions, electrode loadings, electrolyte compositions, additives used, etc. have been provided in contrast to literature reports using commercial cells. This has been done so that others can re-create these cells and use them as benchmarks for their own R+D efforts be they in the spaces of Li-ion cells or “beyond Li-ion cells”. That's incredible. Normally I walk into these wunderbattery threads expecting to heap reproducibility scorn (we're still waiting for solid state glass batteries, and will in all likelihood be waiting forever) but pathways to reproducibility aren't something I'm used to in battery vaporware. I'm actually excited for battery tech, which seems weird given all the disappointment over the previous decade or two. Feels like being excited for another cancer cure in mice.