3 ms·
Well it's a pop-sci book that reads as such. I don't take it to be rigorous, I take it with a "I guess I could see how those dots might connect" food for thoug
by james_s_tayler 7y ago
Well it's a pop-sci book that reads as such. I don't take it to be rigorous, I take it with a "I guess I could see how those dots might connect" food for thought type way.
- knolax 7y agoPopularizing a bunch of disingenuous arguments and presenting it as science isn't excusable no matter the genre.
- james_s_tayler 7y agoI don't find the arguments themselves entirely disingenuous.