4 ms·
It could have just been “pick a computable algorithm that our framework’s UI can render”. Until I don’t see a meaningful program, which answers to a few use ca
by nudpiedo 7y ago
It could have just been “pick a computable algorithm that our framework’s UI can render”.
Until I don’t see a meaningful program, which answers to a few use cases of a user, I wouldn’t take that serious.
Edit: And the abuse of a framework is also something misleading, it is like saying “make an OS in a tweet” and then tweeting: “git clone linux.git && make all && kexec kernel”
- CJefferson 7y agoThis comment doesn't feel useful. Do you only want to see bytes I can pop in the bootsector?
- tkifnn 7y agoThis comment feels even less useful.
- nudpiedo 7y agoMaybe you should define what a program is, which is something over an OS, below a plug-in to a framework and interfaces with a user in order to provide a value or interface. Edit: If my comment is unuseful, how useful is a non standalone program which represents a graph of random values for no purpose at all?