Motl is a zealot for his own interpretation and thinks everyone else is an idiot crackpot, including his colleagues. Carroll does not mention his preference fo

Motl is a zealot for his own interpretation and thinks everyone else is an idiot crackpot, including his colleagues. Carroll does not mention his preference for many-worlds in the article because that's not what it's about. The fact that he has a preferred interpretation is not relevant to the point that physicists should pay closer attention to the lack of consensus on the interpretation of qm.