4 ms·
Seems like nuclear heat and electricity can substitute for hydrocarbons. Abundant heat and power within the atom to compensate for lower efficiency.
by sunkenvicar 7y ago
Seems like nuclear heat and electricity can substitute for hydrocarbons. Abundant heat and power within the atom to compensate for lower efficiency.
- nine_k 7y agoSolar heat concentration and power generation could maybe come close in some scenarios. The main problem is stability.
- RobertRoberts 7y agoAny time I see a discussion about something that needs power someone comes along and says "nuclear power could do that". I don't want to accuse anyone specifically, because I don't have the data to prove it, but it's starting to become so ridiculously consistent that there is no way there's not something going on. No one has a personal investment in nuclear power, it's just electricity. But corporations sure have investments. Feel free to argue how green you think nuclear is that nothing else on the planet could possibly do better. Be sure to note how there's _unlimited_ amounts of nuclear fuel as well.