3 ms·
Exactly this. Also most information of any complexity has multiple “categories” it could fall into. What you actually want is a network graph of concepts and n
by ismail 7y ago
Exactly this. Also most information of any complexity has multiple “categories” it could fall into.
What you actually want is a network graph of concepts and notes. This will let you see relationships.
- qbonnard 7y agoTrilium Notes[0] allows that. In fact I'm surprised that it's not mentioned here, because when I discovered it (via HN IIRC), it seemed to me that Trilium had already implemented everything I could have ever thought of for a note taking/personal knowledge management tool, and more. [0] https://github.com/zadam/trilium https://github.com/zadam/trilium
- agsilvio 7y ago100% correct. It pains me but restricting to a tree was a compromise I wanted to make. Why? Because visualising a graph in a concise way is difficult. The point of jumproot is to have very broad and deep document structures and visual graphs simply don't allow it (to my standards anyway). I'm always on the lookout for a widget that allows me to display a large graph in a very dense way. Please let me know if you come across one.