3 ms·
> Couple of years back owner of the abandoned building was declared liable of the death of the kid who entered to the fenced building despite all the signs no t
by jolmg 7y ago
> Couple of years back owner of the abandoned building was declared liable of the death of the kid who entered to the fenced building despite all the signs no trespassing and so on.
Honestly, that doesn't sound right. I hope I'm misjudging because of lack of details.
- Gibbon1 7y agoIn the the US the term is attractive nuisance. It's not a new thing either, case law in the US dates back to the 1870's.