4 ms·
"4th gen nuclear" that could utilize current waste is years or even decades away from commercial availability. If you want to bet everything on a potential futu
by skrause 7y ago
"4th gen nuclear" that could utilize current waste is years or even decades away from commercial availability. If you want to bet everything on a potential future technology that doesn't currently exist why not choose nuclear fusion? That will really solve all your waste and fuel problems...
- m0zg 7y ago>> "4th gen nuclear" that could utilize current waste is years or even decades away from commercial availability It's not: http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-Russias-BN-800-unit-enters-commercial-operation-01111602.html http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-Russias-BN-800-unit-ent... I agree with you on fusion. But as a stop gap, thorium and 4th gen nuclear sound awesome to me.