3 ms·
>> "This is the big issue around this status / pride stuff. There's never going to be people admitting how they're sensitive about superficial things and there'
by mkr-hn 7y ago
>> "This is the big issue around this status / pride stuff. There's never going to be people admitting how they're sensitive about superficial things and there's this awkward silence to not break the fourth wall and talk about it."
I keep seeing this, but how often is it true? I always answer these questionnaires honestly. The person who made it just wants some good data for their science. I've never felt a need to lie to them.
- tony 7y agoYour honest response could be drowned out by other's errors for innocuous reasons: > response errors in surveys can occur because respondents misunderstand the questions, cannot retrieve all the relevant information, use inaccurate estimation and judgment strategies, round their answers, or have difficulty mapping them onto one of the response categories. These go into survey responses to sensitive questions: - https://www.learnlab.org/research/wiki/images/a/a8/Tourangeau_SensitiveQuestions.pdf https://www.learnlab.org/research/wiki/images/a/a8/Tourangea... - http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.504.8641&rep=rep1&type=pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.504...? I'm straying off topic, they will try in various ways to bullet proof these surveys. I don't know, I think if a group of people are quizzed, there will be more incentive for people to not give accurate answers. Hm: What if they come from a family where a guardian is an alcoholic but don't have a point of relation to compare to, and say it's fine at home? They haven't processed it yet. Outside of surveys, there are blown personality/psychiatric assessments designed to detect over-reporting and malingering: https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1234&context=etd https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?artic...