4 ms·
I disagree that the OP's comment isn't helpful. Mozilla could have taken a tack that would have increased decentralization and promoted privacy (DNS-over-TLS ex
by EvanAnderson 7y ago
I disagree that the OP's comment isn't helpful. Mozilla could have taken a tack that would have increased decentralization and promoted privacy (DNS-over-TLS exists). Instead, they went the way of a centralized protocol that just trades one set of potentially bad actors (ISPs) for another.
re: network policy - If you're paying to use a network with policy that you disagree with vote w/ your wallet. If you're using somebody else's network (i.e. a corporate network I'm paid to administer, for example) it's reasonable to accept that you're bound by the owner's policy-- it's their network.
- mtsr 7y agoI’d love to use DoT, but afaik it’s currently mostly only supported by DNS resolvers (Google, CloudFlare and other privacy-exploiting companies) rather than authoritative DNS servers.