5 ms·
The difference is, DNS-over-HTTPS seems to support cookies and identification. DNS only identified the IP of a person. So it’s clearly an upgrade for Google.
by alexis_fr 7y ago
The difference is, DNS-over-HTTPS seems to support cookies and identification. DNS only identified the IP of a person.
So it’s clearly an upgrade for Google.
- mtsr 7y agoOoh, that's an interesting tack. I wonder if Firefox stores cookies or sends enough headers for fingerprinting DoH requests.
- jedisct1 7y agoA really good presentation on the privacy implications of "modern DNS" by PowerDNS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2F92orIEO8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2F92orIEO8
- zzzcpan 7y ago> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2F92orIEO8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2F92orIEO8 So, given the talk, is the industry finally realizing what Mozilla, Cloudflare and Google are trying to pull off with DoH? I guess this is why the change of hearts from them and letting people block DoH within entire networks, hoping not to attract attention of how much control they want to take away.