5 ms·
It wasn’t just one 16 year old girl, and any educated person dealing with Epstein either knew this or should have. The term “Lolita Express” was widely known fo
by i_am_nomad 7y ago
It wasn’t just one 16 year old girl, and any educated person dealing with Epstein either knew this or should have. The term “Lolita Express” was widely known for years before the current scandal broke. A simple google of Epstein any time after 2008 would have revealed what kind of person he was.
So yes, he should have been exiled by the people in his public life.
- darawk 7y agoLike I said, if it was widely known that he was continuing to engage in this behavior, then I agree, he should have been exiled.
- TheOtherHobbes 7y agoIt was widely known especially in his social circle. Which is why he should have been exiled. And why the fact that he wasn't raises some very uncomfortable questions for the entire industry.
- darawk 7y agoIt was widely known that he kept attractive women around and probably slept with them. It was widely known that these women were probably prostitutes. But so what? The moral transgression here is not sleeping with prostitutes or being lecherous. The moral transgression is conscripting underage girls into prostitution. And it's not at all clear that that was widely known in his social circle.