3 ms·
Yes, I enjoy it and I think it has it's place in the future. Though not sure it's good for every application as apparently the virtual DOM scales much better th
by gitgud 7y ago
Yes, I enjoy it and I think it has it's place in the future. Though not sure it's good for every application as apparently the virtual DOM scales much better than svelte (which doesn't use a virtual DOM).
But I love the syntactical sugar in the svelte library. And the single file components make you very productive.
I think that utility css like [1] tailwind.css is definitely going to grow in the future. It seems verbose at first but the re-usability and fast development time, makes you extremely productive!
[1] https://tailwindcss.com https://tailwindcss.com
- breck 7y agoCool! Thanks for the information. " Though not sure it's good for every application as apparently the virtual DOM scales much better than svelte". My understanding of the pattern is that svelte should in theory scale better because you could do more optimizations at compile time. But perhaps I need to dig deeper on how it's implemented. > And the single file components make you very productive. Good to know you like this, thanks. I've started to do the same (single file components with style, html, and script in one) as well. I'll have to explore tailwindcss. Not sure if I've seen that before, thanks!