3 ms·
That’s more of an argument for not using sin taxes to fund anything other than public health measures to combat the effects of consuming the thing that’s being
by pmiller2 7y ago
That’s more of an argument for not using sin taxes to fund anything other than public health measures to combat the effects of consuming the thing that’s being taxed.
- duxup 7y agoIt is but it demonstrates why you want a more even tax base just to help ride out any changes in economics or usage. Also even direct sin taxes tied to things might be hard. If we all stop smoking, there still be cancer related to smoking... Gas tax to fund roads, and increased fuel efficiency is another example.