When you take all three to extremes you get problems, but when you take the third to an extreme you get problems which hurt other people. Extreme mathematical

When you take all three to extremes you get problems, but when you take the third to an extreme you get problems which hurt other people. Extreme mathematical programming is turning theorems into code; Metamath is an example of this, as is Coq. Nobody uses this code because it isn't meant to be used outside of a mathematical context. http://us.metamath.org/index.html http://us.metamath.org/index.html Extreme hardware hackers are either designing missile guidance systems or mirrors which turn your face into a plot of its Fourier transform. If their code explodes, it's either doing so in accordance with a design document taller than you are or it isn't a problem because exploding mirrors are even more fun than the normal kind. Extreme maker programmers, as the site says: > Taken to the extreme, this world view doesn't value the beauty in the engineering itself. Taken to the extreme, this group actively derides good design because good design takes time and Real Artists Ship. Real Artists Make Deadlines, too, and Real Deadlines Are Set By Marketing. You end up with janky crap that looks good but leaks your password to anyone who breathes on it, as sold by people who think being proactive with lawsuits is a good substitute for keeping your data secure. Security Through Suing Anyone Who Says It Isn't Secure, in other words.