3 ms·
This is not a launch alternative. This is maybe a get-to-geostationary alternative. This is really an L1-base station-keeping alternative. The Moon-side cabl
by logfromblammo 7y ago
This is not a launch alternative. This is maybe a get-to-geostationary alternative. This is really an L1-base station-keeping alternative. The Moon-side cable anchors the base in the radial direction, and the Earth-side cable keeps the Moon-side cable in tension, and lowers the fuel cost of reaching orbits that the cable crosses.
The math suggests that putting a rendezvous base 41% of the way from the Earth to the Moon would be better than extending more cable down into Earth's gravity well. Meeting the cable closer to Earth would always cost more fuel. You could save fuel to GEO by meeting the cable further out, and then climbing back towards Earth. But every bit of extra cable you add on the Earth side increases the tension at the max-tension point at L1.
So just stop at the lowest-fuel rendezvous height, and add enough mass there to keep the whole cable in tension, but not enough to break the cable at L1.
(The L1 point is at about 84% the distance from Earth to Moon.)
The same type of material would likely be usable to anchor a halo relay satellite slightly beyond Earth-Moon L2, just by bolting it down to the darkest antipodal point on the dark side of the Moon.
- dredmorbius 7y agoIf you can source materials in situ, this might be a useful way to create GEO platforms at lower cost than Earth launch.
- logfromblammo 7y agoIf the theory is correct, you could build satellites on the Moon and slowly walk them to GEO at zero fuel cost with solar power. Any circular orbit with height between 5% and 41% of the Earth-Moon distance could be placed more cheaply by flying out to rendezvous at 41% with fuel, then walking it back in along the cable with solar power.
- Tepix 7y ago> This is maybe a get-to-geostationary alternative. How would you use it to reach geostationary orbit?