For me the absence of coverage, or low coverage, is a useful piece of information. It's not the whole story but it is a smell, and it should be taken into consi

For me the absence of coverage, or low coverage, is a useful piece of information. It's not the whole story but it is a smell, and it should be taken into consideration with the other smells/signals Conversely perfect or high coverage is not a positive signal per se, but rather just the absence of a negative signal