I would agree. I think if you're talking about high-level design in a code review then either: A) You've revealed a need to get more alignment on design, and s

I would agree. I think if you're talking about high-level design in a code review then either: A) You've revealed a need to get more alignment on design, and should probably be explicit that the discussion has this purpose. B) You're doing a code review of a spike so that you can get alignment about the design lessons the spike teaches...and should be explicit that the discussion has this purpose.