4 ms·
Agreed. Because it takes longer to charge than fill up with gas they won't be able to get sufficient volume.
by thinkcontext 7y ago
Agreed. Because it takes longer to charge than fill up with gas they won't be able to get sufficient volume.
- ianlevesque 7y agoBut if you are bored there longer you're more likely to buy something?
- test6554 7y agoPerhaps they will charge extra money to charge a car at the full speed the car is capable of and hobble charging speed for a lower price.
- BrentOzar 7y ago> Perhaps they will charge extra money to charge a car at the full speed the car is capable of and hobble charging speed for a lower price. This would tie up their charging infrastructure and space for a longer time, making less money. Gas stations & charging venues are usually space-constrained because they're located on expensive real estate. Their goal is to maximize revenue and throughput in small spaces.
- mulmen 7y agoDo they do that with gas pumps?
- jnty 7y agoNo, but you can't browse in a shop while filling up with petrol (at least in the UK where we don't have those locks which keep the pump on while you walk away.)
- mulmen 7y agoHmm, good point, I hadn't considered that. EV charging is totally unattended. Makes me wonder what benefits there are to convenience store sales in states where "full service" is required.
- Tade0 7y agoI think it's the slow parking-spot chargers which are going to kill gas stations eventually. IIRC CA already requires new buildings to be prepped for charging stations. I mean, why drive somewhere to charge when you can plug in overnight and wake up to a car with 200km+ more worth of charge?
- thinkcontext 7y agoThen the format would have to change. They are optimized to sell skittles and slurpees as fast as possible, there would be no point in spending 15 more minutes at a current gas station convenience store. Makes more sense to put chargers in places people park, like grocery stores.