3 ms·
I really don't think so. The cheap and easy thing has always been to burn the fossil fuels, cut down the forests, fish until there are no more fish, and hunt un
by inimino 7y ago
I really don't think so. The cheap and easy thing has always been to burn the fossil fuels, cut down the forests, fish until there are no more fish, and hunt until there are no more prey. The only hope for the future is if we care for it.
- EGreg 7y agoWhat about emerging countries increasing women’s education and having fewer children much later?
- inimino 7y agoWhat about it?
- ds0hhz 7y agoInstead of beating around the bush and choose easy targets such as fossil fuels and forests, do something about it.
- inimino 7y agoAh, so... you think more people should be working on this? I'm under the impression everyone in those poor countries with high birth rates is already working to move themselves or their country into a better economic position, and when they do, birth rates will fall and resource consumption will still go up, because rich people consume more resources, even when there are fewer of them. How does that solve the problem of the so-called "easy targets" like fossil fuels and forests?