3 ms·
You can't assume GRB170817A isn't a supernova because there is an associated GW170817A; that's begging the question.
by dnautics 7y ago
You can't assume GRB170817A isn't a supernova because there is an associated GW170817A; that's begging the question.
- throwaway2048 7y agoLIGO doesn't detect supernovas, so its irrelevant
- SiempreViernes 7y agoWhy do you think I'm assuming the type of the most well studied optical transient we've had this century? This is a source that was observed by something like a hundred different teams. I'm ruling out a SN origin on the basis of the (at least) dozen of direct observations that show it isn't.