5 ms·
Where's a link to the actual paper/ peer-reviewed publication?
by ThinkBeforeDo 7y ago
Where's a link to the actual paper/ peer-reviewed publication?
- qnsi 7y agoShould be here but can't get it on sci-hub Fahy, G. M. et al. Aging Cell https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.13028 https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.13028 (2019).
- Tringi 7y agoI'm searching for it too, and I can't find the actual text. Somebody doesn't want us to begin mixing that cocktail ourselves :D
- qnsi 7y agoI don't think it's published yet. Should in the recent tab on this site I think https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14749726 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14749726
- Camisade 7y agoWhen I first saw that article, I swear it contained a link to the associated paper in Aging Cell. Now when I go to the Nature.com article, that link is no longer there. How many people are currently thinking, "All three drugs/compounds are pretty well understood, and reasonably benign when administered under a Doctor's supervision with periodic blood testing; in the absence of specificity, let's just start with fairly standard daily prescription doses and see what happens..." As someone afflicted by 'chronic aging' (at the rate of one year, per year), I'm hugely fascinated by prospective "cures." ;-)
- phaedrus11 7y agohttps://www.gwern.net/docs/longevity/2019-fahy.pdf https://www.gwern.net/docs/longevity/2019-fahy.pdf
- gwern 7y agoIt's finally available: https://www.gwern.net/docs/longevity/2019-fahy.pdf https://www.gwern.net/docs/longevity/2019-fahy.pdf
- xiphias2 7y agoThanks! How did you get it? Were you part of the research? It's interesting to me how important the results are and how underreported this research is at the same time.
- gwern 7y agoThird-hand by way of Daniel Lemire via Twitter. Moot at this point, however, as the official DOI-linkable version is now up: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/acel.13028 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/acel.13028