5 ms·
> the companies have been able to "hire the best, the top 1% (or 2%)" Citation strongly needed. Having worked with a lot of big companies, I'd say Top 20% is
by mdorazio 7y ago
> the companies have been able to "hire the best, the top 1% (or 2%)"
Citation strongly needed. Having worked with a lot of big companies, I'd say Top 20% is still generous.
- trhway 7y ago1 or 20 doesnt matter - for any N>0 only one company can do "top N", not all of them who pretend to achieve that, and they wouldn't be able to pretend it if they used the random approach like the GGP suggested.