3 ms·

Right, right, but then how useful would Mug be if the dynamic stuff in JS can't be used?

• JonnieCache 16y ago
  Munging strings and then eval()ing them is the worst way to write dynamic code. Hopefully its not common in most js libraries. Missing eval() is a feature.
  • latortuga 16y ago
    As a follow up in case anyone is curious about the why behind this assertion, consider a line of code like this eval("myObject."+functionName+"()") Not only does it make it difficult to track down the calls to this method, it is now impossible to minify this chunk of code, something that is very commonly done in javascript. This is why javascript includes things like apply() and accessing members of an object in multiple ways (obj.attribute == obj['attribute'], for user-defined values of attribute).
    • deleted 16y ago
      [deleted]
• phuff 16y ago
  The "dynamic stuff" appears to all be included. Just not eval(), which is probably a bad thing for most JS code anyway...