4 ms·
Wappalyzer [1] is much better in my opinion. And is available for both Chrome [2] and Firefox [3] as well as a Bookmarklet [4]. The extension that @pier25 is
by guessmyname 7y ago
Wappalyzer [1] is much better in my opinion.
And is available for both Chrome [2] and Firefox [3] as well as a Bookmarklet [4].
The extension that @pier25 is using seems to be available only on Google Chrome [5].
[1] https://www.wappalyzer.com/ https://www.wappalyzer.com/
[2] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/wappalyzer/gppongmhjkpfnbhagpmjfkannfbllamg https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/wappalyzer/gppongm...
[3] https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/wappalyzer/ https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/wappalyzer/
[4] https://www.wappalyzer.com/download https://www.wappalyzer.com/download
[5] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ui-stack/ijagbooglignnjecmjnmdfapfbgblkdk https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ui-stack/ijagboogl...
- fireattack 7y agoSimilar tools include WhatRuns [1] (Chrome only). [1] https://www.whatruns.com/ https://www.whatruns.com/
- pier25 7y agoThanks, Wappalyzer looks pretty awesome.
- twhb 7y agoWappalyzer's results for example.com, a 1.3 KB static page with no JS or sub-requests, include eight JS frameworks and two web font providers. Its results for facebook.com include a web framework made by Yahoo and deprecated in 2014. It says Youtube is built on WordPress, and HN is a React app with custom fonts.