3 ms·

On an individual basis, it's a legitimate question. On a bigger scale, the iPhone was/is a game changer.

by mping 7y ago

Slartie 7y ago
Not "was/is", just "was". A customer that decides today doesn't care much about the iPhone legacy, but only if he/she can satisfy all their personal requirements with today's phones and ecosystems. And on that metric there's just as many people preferring iPhones as there are preferring Android devices, because none is clearly superior across the board, but each of them has different strengths and it is a question of personal preference which strengths someone values more.
- repolfx 7y ago
  Well, not exactly. Android has mich higher market share than iOS. There's not just as many preferring iPhones, not even close, though it may feel that way in certain geographies.
  - koffiezet 7y ago
    Not that many preferring iPhones? People not having iPhones has mostly to do with the 'luxury' aspect of them. Many want an one, but can't/don't want to spend the money on it. The absolute majority of Android devices sold is the sub-€300 market, many subsidised. It's mostly the tech-savvy crowd that on purpose buys an Android from what I see. Just look at the insane secondhand value of any iPhone. Even my perfectly working old iPhone 6S I use as a backup would still sell for €240 today - which is absolutely nuts...
    - repolfx 7y ago
      That's not what prefer means. By your logic just as many people prefer to fly in private jets as fly economy, but that's a meaningless statement - they don't prefer it, they prefer cheaper options and to spend the money on other things. Clearly by any definition the vast majority prefer to buy phones cheaper than Apple sell them, but the high end Android market does great too. Really Android just dominates completely in every market and has done for a very long time, which is why Apple fans like to talk about Apple taking most of the profit (as if this is a good thing!).

On an individual basis, it's a legitimate question. On a bigger scale, the iPhone was/is a game changer.

by mping 7y ago

On an individual basis, it's a legitimate question. On a bigger scale, the iPhone was/is a game changer.

Not "was/is", just "was". A customer that decides today doesn't care much about the iPhone legacy, but only if he/she can satisfy all their personal requirements with today's phones and ecosystems. And on that metric there's just as many people preferring iPhones as there are preferring Android devices, because none is clearly superior across the board, but each of them has different strengths and it is a question of personal preference which strengths someone values more.

repolfx 7y ago
Well, not exactly. Android has mich higher market share than iOS. There's not just as many preferring iPhones, not even close, though it may feel that way in certain geographies.
- koffiezet 7y ago
  Not that many preferring iPhones? People not having iPhones has mostly to do with the 'luxury' aspect of them. Many want an one, but can't/don't want to spend the money on it. The absolute majority of Android devices sold is the sub-€300 market, many subsidised. It's mostly the tech-savvy crowd that on purpose buys an Android from what I see. Just look at the insane secondhand value of any iPhone. Even my perfectly working old iPhone 6S I use as a backup would still sell for €240 today - which is absolutely nuts...
  - repolfx 7y ago
    That's not what prefer means. By your logic just as many people prefer to fly in private jets as fly economy, but that's a meaningless statement - they don't prefer it, they prefer cheaper options and to spend the money on other things. Clearly by any definition the vast majority prefer to buy phones cheaper than Apple sell them, but the high end Android market does great too. Really Android just dominates completely in every market and has done for a very long time, which is why Apple fans like to talk about Apple taking most of the profit (as if this is a good thing!).