3 ms·
Not legally, they would still need to have a legal order for garnishment, I assume.
by asdf21 7y ago
Not legally, they would still need to have a legal order for garnishment, I assume.
- nroach 7y agoGarnishment is against accounts held by a third party. If the right to withhold or draw from already-authorized sources is part of their contract on either the payments or lending side (and I can't imagine it wouldn't be), no garnishment should be needed as they're in direct contractual privity.