4 ms·

Not the author, but I think the article indirectly talks about the liquidity in the markets being far higher than it has been in the past. Further, if there is

Not the author, but I think the article indirectly talks about the liquidity in the markets being far higher than it has been in the past. Further, if there is a stampede for the exits, there still have to be buyers on the other side of the sellers. Those buyers will undoubtably include active managers along with those indexers with different time horizons and/or braver constitutions. Both will likely be rewarded for their patience.

ptero 7y ago
> if there is a stampede for the exits, there still have to be buyers on the other side of the sellers That is a key point in the debate. I do not see that above is necessarily true. Say a price of a low volume stock X is driven down below fundamentals just because index funds have to sell 1% of holdings and cannot find enough buyers for X. While price of X might be irrational fund managers might not be able to act on it because there would be a worry that it may go lower still if selling extends. Could next round get X removed from index? delisted? "The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent" is not an empty worry. My 2c.