> Your attack is an odd one. I wouldn't call wmeredith's comment an "attack", it's a civilly written challenge. That aside. It may be true that baby boxes in

> Your attack is an odd one. I wouldn't call wmeredith's comment an "attack", it's a civilly written challenge. That aside. It may be true that baby boxes in and of themselves aren't directly responsible for the reduction of child mortality rates (say from sudden cot death); there doesn't seem to have been any research into the long term benefits of the "box" itself. But it's the holistic approach to ensuring kids get a good start in life and the box, the contents etc is one small part of that.