4 ms·

Does anyone know the name of this judge? He should be publicly shamed.

• gonzo 7y ago
  From the article: “Judge Rachel Rancilio saw the posts, many of which are publicly targeted at her. She apparently felt uncomfortable and possibly threatened.”
  • spacemanmatt 7y ago
    Even if she believed she legitimately felt threatened, she had to know her actions as a judge would paint a much huger target on her back.
    • cardiffspaceman 7y ago
      Given a situation where a person (who might have been speaking on a protected topic like the administration of justice) said something the judge felt threatened by, the fact-finding and judgement should not have been left to that judge. A different judge, though no less prone to an emotional rather than rational response due to similarity of circumstances, would give the results a little more credibility.